Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Sharon vs. Herman

I don't like Herman Cain. I think he would be a terrible president. I don't know if he ever harassed anyone, but I wish his most recent accuser could have made a stronger rejection than she described.

In yesterday's press conference, Sharon Bialek recalled her conversation with Herman Cain: “I said, ‘What are you doing? You know I have a boyfriend.’”

What does her having a boyfriend have to do with it being OK or not OK for him to put his hand up her skirt and pull her head toward his penis?

Was Sharon implying that it would have been OK if she did not have a boyfriend? Couldn't she come up with a better argument? Maybe, "I'm not your girlfriend or your wife. I don't want to have sex with you. Don't touch me!"

Why not smack him in the face, call him a creep, and get out of the car?



  1. Cain, I do not like also. I think there was going mutual between the two for one reason---Sharon's objection---I have a boyfriend--is NOT what a woman would say under those conditions. That is not to say Cain is innocent--I doubt it dearly. Right now, he needs to close up the tents and take his show off the road. Not doubt before its over there will be more women, and I would not be surprised if a baby was in the mix. The GOP could not survive if Cain became president.

  2. Cain is not qualified to be President.

    She is a liar.