The Complete Guide to Self Publishing has been promoted as "The Bible of Self-Publishing," and criticizing it is almost like criticizing the Bible. In fact, the book is almost as old as the Old Testament. I'm exaggerating. The first version, written by Tom and Marilyn Ross, was apparently published in 1978, when self-publishing was very different from today.
I bought the out-of-date 4th edition in 2008, and the new 5th edition in 2010. It's also out-of-date, and was out of date when it was printed. It was adapted and updated by Marilyn Ross and Sue Collier from the earlier versions
It's advertised as "Completely revised and updated," but it needs more updating.
Many thousands of copies of various editions of this book have been sold, and it has received many good reviews and blurbs. Like the Bible, there are problems with this book. People get into trouble if they rely on books with good reputations that provide bad information.
- The discussion of discounts shows a range of 40 to 67 per cent, but there is no mention of the 20% discount common in online sales.
- The book shows a chart of quantity discounts, but this is meaningless unless the self-publisher maintains and ships inventory -- which is uncommon in the era of print-on-demand.
- The section dealing with the cost of "subsidy and POD publishing" states that Lulu charges about $853 for 100 books. That price is too much to pay, and no author should order 100 books from Lulu.
- The quoted price of $8.53 to $13.19 per book from CreateSpace is much too high, and the real CreateSpace prices do not mean that "you'll lose considerable money on each sale."
- The discussion of POD print quality is out of date and unnecessarily negative.
- Many web addresses are non-functioning.
- Ebook material is ancient. The index doesn't include either "ebook" or "e-book."
- It includes "Click-through rate." "Click-through ratio" is much more common.
- "Cataloging in Publication" needs more explanation.
- "Cropping" refers to using a pencil or crayon -- but not digital cropping.
- It says that LCCN stands for "Library of Congress Card Number." It's "Control" number.
- It says that a modem is used with a microcomputer. Modems are nearly extinct. Microcomputers are completely extinct. The term was replaced by "PC" around 1980.
- The definition of "net receipts" uses the quaint and legalistic plural "moneys." "Money" would work just fine.
- The definition of "photostat" is wrong, and the term is irrelevant to self-publishing.
- The definition of "platform" is a computer operating system, but there is a much more common use in publishing. An author's platform consists of all of the connections an author uses to reach readers, such as a blog or speaking engagements.
- The definition of "POD self-publishing" is unnecessarily negative.
- "Posting" mentions ancient newsgroup submissions, but not blogs.
- "Proportion wheel" is a tool of ancient paste-up page formatting, not modern electronic formatting.
- "Public Relations" is not in the glossary or the index.
- "SASE" is probably a waste of space and does not need to be there.
- OTOH, "Self-publishing" -- the subject of the book -- is not in the glossary.
- "Slug" is an ancient printing term which could have been eliminated. However, it has a meaning in journalism, even in the 21st century, which could have been included.
- "Stripping" is another ancient printing term which should be dropped.
- Defining "telecommunications" is a waste of space.
The book definitely shows its age. It sometimes seems to regard the Internet as a novelty.
- The recommendation that web pages must load in eight seconds or less was appropriate in the age of modems, but not now, with ubiquitous broadband.
- Ancient fan-boy jargon like “surfer,” and spelling “Web site” instead of “website,” and uppercasing “Net” and “Web” make the book seem like a 90-year-old in a nursing home dressing like a teenager.
The front cover looks absolutely ancient -- but not funky-ancient, just dull-ancient. There is poor contrast between the type and background, and when the cover is shown as a thumbnail on Amazon.com, only the word “SELF” can be read.
I am extremely disappointed with the interior design. The book is just plain hard to read.
The text type is small. The ink color looks more like gray than black, so there is not nearly enough contrast against the cream-colored pages. White would have been better.
The italic captions are even smaller than the text, and words within illustrations are nearly illegible. The fly-turd-size italics in the index are almost useless.
Chapter names are in tiny italic type in the page footers, and my baby-boomer eyes had trouble reading them with my new glasses. (For the record, I have no trouble with newspapers, magazines or most books, and my PC monitor is set for “normal” size type.)
I recognize that there's a lot of material in this 556-page 6 x 9 book. If it had 7 x 10-inch pages, the type could have been larger and the thinner book would be easier to keep flat for reading and annotating.
- Even with the present page size, the leading (space between lines) could have been reduced a bit to allow larger type.
- The index needs a thorough pruning. By eliminating terms like “Homer Simpson,” “Pegine Echevarria,” “FAO Schwartz” and “J.C. Penney” -- which NO ONE would search for in a book about publishing -- some space could be rescued for enlarged text.
- Also, I doubt that readers need separate listings for Tim Zagat, Nina Zagat and the Zagat survey -- which are all on the same page in the book.
- Suggestions that the reader kill time by looking at Hubble space telescope images, or use Google images as monitor wallpaper seem inappropriate -- and waste space.
It could continue as an artifact showing the way things used to be, like The Compleat Angler. That book was first published in 1653, but you can buy a freshly printed copy on Amazon.